Archive for the ‘Misc’ Category

Difference between Sour Milk and Spoiled Milk – Food Tips

August 6th, 2011
5,862 views No comments

From my friend A.C., a great dining companion who is a fountain of knowledge about certain subjects…

Long forgotten fact:
Sour milk is 100% SAFE to drink. Spoiled milk is not. Sour and spoiled are not the same, and spoiled milk is not always sour. What do you think yogurt, sour cream, and cottage cheese are made of??? In fact, today’s sour milk is MUCH SAFER than sour milk from, say 250 years ago.

There are old fashioned sour milk recipes available online and in cook books if you don’t want to waste milk that’s been sitting in the fridge for days past expiry date. Can also be used in alcoholic drinks too, if you’re having guests over. 🙂


Visit A.C.’s bookbinding website here.


Project Empty Bowl fundraiser event info, July 7th 2011

June 26th, 2011
3,142 views No comments

presented by Coast Capital Savings

to support A Loving Spoonful: providing free nutritious food for men, women and children living with HIV/AIDS.

Thursday, July 7th, 2011 – 6:30 pm
at the Coast Coal Harbour Hotel

Gourmet cuisine served in a hand-crafted souvenir bowl (yours to keep)
Master of Ceremonies: Deborra Hope, Global TV News BC
Live & Silent Auction, Auctioneer: Hugh Bulmer from Maynards

Tickets: $85 if purchased before June 24, 2011, $100 if purchased after June 24th
For more information or to purchase tickets online visit or call 604.682.6325

Join us at the Project Empty Bowl Live Art Preview Exhibition
at the Waterfall Building – 1540 West 2nd Ave, Vancouver, BC
June 27th – July 1st (8 am – 5 pm Open Daily)

A Loving Spoonful hopes to provide over 100,000 meals to men, women and children living with HIV/AIDS in our community.


Some fun Youtube Video mashups from

June 26th, 2011
3,095 views No comments

My Contact Lens Eye Redness Problems solved!!

November 3rd, 2010
97,676 views 1 comment
Geoff Peters

photos by LauraOuk

For the last 3 years I have been wearing contact lenses instead of glasses. I love them, as I found that glasses don’t look very good on me – and people now remark that I have beautiful eyes. Thanks people!

Acuvue Advance contact lenses

But in the last 9 months I have had chronic redness in one of my eyes – always bloodshot and irritated. This is really bad for one’s appearance and it was worrying me because I haven’t been for an optometrist checkup in a while. I was worried about the health of my eyes. In the mornings before I put in my lenses my eyes would be white and clear and then after an hour of wearing the lenses the left eye would become bloodshot and very red. This started getting only worse over the last few weeks.

I am using Acuvue Advance with Astigmatism which I usually wear daily for about a month, taking them out and cleaning them every night. I noticed that the first day after putting in a new pair of contact lenses, my eyes were white and clear the whole day. But the second day and subsequent days, my eyes would be red again.

In short, I found the solution to my redness problem!! I am so happy and I want to share it with you.

It’s simple – every month, at the same time that I throw away the old lenses, I now also throw out the plastic contact lens case and get a new case. It’s important to throw away the lenses and the case at the same time!! My lens case was contaminated and even if I put fresh lenses into the case, it would immediately contaminate the fresh lenses.

Who knew it could be so simple! Now I don’t look like a fire eye’d boy no more!

Contact lens case


Idea / Invention: Music recordings that sound different on each play

June 11th, 2010
4,031 views 7 comments

I had a neat idea as I was driving to a gig. I get really fed up with the recordings (stack of cd’s) in my car as I’ve listened to them so many times, and every time I listen to them, they are the same!

I thought, why not make a recording that sounds different every time you play it?

Sound crazy? Well, it’s really quite possible to do, and wouldn’t be very hard.

Usually when a band records a song, they might do multiple takes, say 4 or 5 takes. For certain sections of the song, such as an instrumental solo, it would be cool if it would sound different every time. The artist or recording engineer could “program” the song to play a different, random take for a certain section of the song, each time the recording is played, or combine together parts of any of the takes in a new or somewhat random way. A single solo section could be further broken down into segments, such as a certain number of bars, and each segment could be swapped in with a different take, as the music is played.

There are a bunch of extensions to this idea:
– if this is on a website, allow the user to save their particular performance that they heard, and share it with others (and rate them, etc)

– instead of a purely random choice of the takes, the user could give input into the choices such as “I’d like a really upbeat and lively version of this song”, or “I’d really like a version of this song with a longer sax solo and less Britney”.

-if the “intensity” of the performance was hooked up to a foot pedal (e.g. the recording would become more excited as the pedal is depressed lower, and more relaxed as the pedal is released) an actual live musician could play along with such a recording, while controlling the intensity of the background recording, and have the background music follow his/her performance.

Please – let me know what you think!! And please take this idea, expand on it, and develop something new, as I mostly have time to think these days and not implement something, even so cool as this!


Update, Sept. 11, 2010: I’ve created a player which implements this concept, and made it open source. Check it out at Includes an example song.


(offtopic) Discussion about sports trading cards

January 29th, 2010
1,663 views No comments

Here is a discussion between my friend Alvenh Channe and some facebook friends about the value of sports trading cards that we collected in the 80’s and 90’s.

Hey Guys,

Just curious, did any of you ever collect baseball/hockey/football/basketball cards back in the 80’s-90’s? Also, has anyone ever bought Magic The Gathering cards (a.k.a. “Magic Cards”) or World of Warcraft cards in the recent past?

I’m just going through a collection of cards that has not seen the light of day in almost 20 years. My collection spans from 1949 to 1991 and mostly worthless now. And my Michael Jordan and Pavel Bure cards, once worth $30-$50 each in its heyday are now worth about 50 cents each. 🙁

Interesting – I never collected them, I have a few that I got from friends including a basketball card in a plastic hard case! I don’t know where they are – I haven’t seen them for like 15 years.

If they were 90’s gems, chance are, they’re worth very little today.

so the price eventually goes down?

Ben, it all depends on supply and demand. In the early days of modern card collecting (1946 to 1970’s) kids collected cards for the challenge of trying to complete a set; they were not collecting for the money and cards were often stored in shoe boxes or taped to bedroom walls. The kids grew up, went to college or university, and mothers across the USA and Canada threw out their kid’s card collections in the process of cleaning out their rooms. As a result, older cards became scarce and those in mint condition were extremely rare.

Card collecting made a comeback in the mid 80’s but this time, they were collected as an investment. From about 1985 to the major league baseball players’ strike in the mid 1990’s, kid all over North America were buying all kinds of sport cards, keeping them in mint condition. And to keep up with the demand, card companies like Upper Deck kept printing them to the point of overproduction.

This second generation of collectors have grown up and many now have kids of their own. Being raised in the internet age, hardly any kids of today have interest in sport cards, thus no longer any demand. Also, as a result of video games, game cards – such as Magic The Gathering, World of Warcraft, Pokemon, Yu Gi Oh, and others – currently dominate the market of collectible cards. Even so, the sport card classics will continue to hold its value for many years to come long after the game cards cool off.

So yes, the price of most cards from the 80’s/90’s (the junk era) have went down but there are exceptions as a few have unexpectedly went up in value. One example is a McDonald’s Upper Hockey set from 1991 (which I still have) in which its cards, almost worthless originally, are now valued at $2.50 each, according to the Beckett guide (Beckett’s prices are considered standard and official). Also, as thousands of junk era cards across the USA are being thrown-out every day, our collections may become valuable again in 20 years as they become rarer, especially if there is a resurgence in card collecting. So Ben and Nathaniel, do me a favor and throw out your 80’s/90’s sport trading cards. They are, after all taking up valuable space, aren’t they? 🙂

Hey this is really interesting Alvenh… can I publish this thread on my web site? I will give you guys credit of course and link to your sites. Let me know!

Sure but i’m no expert though.


(offtopic) Transformer Basics – by Alvenh Channe

January 29th, 2010
1,461 views No comments

I just wanted to answer some of the questions you’ve had earlier about the electronics stuff. I’m sorry I didn’t have the time to sit down to explain. So, let us begin with a discussion of transformer basics…

What is a transformer?

There are many different types of transformers, but basically, a transformer is simply a device that uses electricity (AC) to generate electricity. By doing that, they accomplish one or more of the following tasks: convert high voltage AC to low voltage AC (called step-down transformers), jack-up low voltage AC to high voltage AC (called step-up transformers), isolation of one circuit from another (isolation transformers), impedance matching, removal of DC component from mixed AC/DC signals, and other tasks.

As you might have learned in your high school physics class, moving charges (i.e. electrons or protons in motion) generate magnetism, thus if you have an electric current running thru a wire, a magnetic field is created around the wire. The strength of the magnetic field is determined by the amount of current, which is given by the equation F = IlB, where F is magnetic force, I is current, l is length of wire, and B is magnetic field. DC results in a non-changing magnetic field; AC results in an alternating magnetic field (one in which north and south keeps changing back and forth).

Now, going the other way, if a wire is placed in a CHANGING field, a current is generated or INDUCED in the conductor (the wire) such that its magnetic field acts to oppose the change. If the wire is placed is a NON-changing magnetic field, there is no current generated because there is no need to oppose any changes; however, if you MOVE the conductor in a way such that it “cuts” the lines of magnetic forces, this motion mimics the magnetic activity of an alternating field and a current will be generated in the conductor. That’s how basic mechanical electric generators work by converting kinetic energy (energy of motion) to electrical energy.

On the other hand, you can apply an electric current to a conductor that’s already in a magnetic field and the conductor will start to move (like poles between B-field of wire and magnet repel; opposite polarities attract). That’s how electric motors work. And that’s why electric motors with permanent magnets can be used as generators and vice versa.

Now, what if you have coil of wire (with an electric current running thru it) wrapped around an iron core? You’d have an electromagnet. But what if you ran AC into the coil? You’d have an electromagnet with alternating magnetic field (north and south poles keeps swapping at a rate of whatever the AC frequency is). As I have mentioned above, if a conductor is placed in an alternating magnetic field, an alternating current is induced (generated) in the conductor. So, what if I took a second coil of wire (with no current running thru) and placed it onto the same core (the AC electromagnet)? Well, in this case, as you might have guessed, an AC voltage is generated in the second coil. Also, as you might have noticed, the second coil is isolated from the first. This device (coils plus iron core) is called an induction coil, commonly known as a TRANSFORMER.

In a transformer, the coil in which you apply AC is called the primary winding (or simply the primary). The other coil in which an alternating current is generated is called the secondary winding (or simply the secondary). Voltage in the secondary can be of the same voltage as in the primary or can be higher or lower. Although, all transformers with separate primary and secondary windings perform the task of isolation, the transformers I have mentioned are known respectively as isolation, step-up and step-down.

If there are MORE windings in the secondary than in primary, the output voltage will be GREATER than that of the input voltage as in the case of a step-up. If the secondary has LESS turns of wire than the primary, the output voltage will be LOWER than that of the input voltage, as in the case of a step-down transformer. If a transformer is 100% efficient, the TURNS RATIO is equal to the VOLTAGE RATIO. Thus, a transformer that’s used to step down 120 volts to 60 volts would have a turns ratio of 2:1.
(Note: Transformers with an efficiency of less than 85% are considered dangerous, as the rest of the input energy is converted to heat.)

So, you may be wondering, can I take a 2:1 step down (like the one described above), reverse the wiring and use it as a step-up transformer to convert 120 volts to 240 volts? Theoretically speaking, it is possible…BUT…in reality, the coils, WITH RESPECT TO the core material, are NOT rated to handle those voltages. If there are not enough turns, the windings will not be able to handle higher voltages since there would be more magnetic flux than the core could hold. This results in flux offset known as core saturation. Current in wire will increase to dangerous levels, and your transformer will go up in smoke and melt.

The transformer doesn’t know if it’s a step-down or step-up, but it does know the voltage ratings of the windings. Thus, you can take what is normally a 120-volt-to-6-volt step-down transformer and use it to step-up 6 volts to 120 volts by applying 6 volts to the 6 volt windings. In this case, what is normally the secondary is now used as the primary. As I have mentioned, 1:1 transformers also exist.

So, why would anybody want to convert 120 volts to 120 volts when you can get that right out of the wall without having to spend extra? The answer is isolation, and transformers used to perform such tasks are called isolation transformers.

Isolation is important when you want to work with live circuits. On the unisolated primary (house wiring), one side of the 120 volt line is connected to ground and it’s called neutral. The other side of the 120 volt line is known as the “hot” side, which measures at 120 volts WITH RESPECT TO THE GROUND YOU ARE STANDING ON. Thus, if you come in contact with the “hot” side of the wiring, you will receive a shock. An isolation transformer gives you 120 volts completely UNGROUNDED on the secondary. Therefore, should you come in contact with any one side of the 120 volt secondary, you will not get shocked. However, if contacting both sides of the secondary is equally as dangerous as contact with both sides (or one hot side) of the primary.

Transformers that are built into power supplies to provide power to equipment are known as “power transformer”. The Hammond 269AX used in the AECA transmitter is an example of a power transformer.  If you go to a store like Future Shop to buy a modern stereo system, you’ll notice that the device has a power cord for you to plug into the wall so that there is electricity to run the system.

Although the power that comes out of the wall outlet is 120 volts AC (really 117 VAC at 60 cycles in Canada, US, and Mexico), the stereo system does NOT run on 117 volts AC. Instead, a step-down power transformer that is built into the system converts 117 VAC to 12 or 24 volts or so on which your system is designed to use. Also, the 12 or 24 (or whatever) volts from the transformer is AC, and will need to be converted to DC before it can be used by the system.

An example: that big block that you plug into that wall to recharge you Nokia cell phone contains a step-down transformer. However, in the olden days when tubes were used, 117 volts from your wall was often insufficient for equipment. Therefore, step-up power transformers were often used to convert 117 volts AC to HIGHER voltages. Household tube devices usually require 200 to 600 volts to run. The AECA transmitter is an example of a device that uses a step-up transformer to provide 250 volts for the tubes.

Step-up and step-down transformers are also used a lot by the power company (BC Hydro). The power created by water turbine generators at the dams create about 10,000 to 100,000 volts of electricity. Step-up transformers boost up the voltage to anywhere between 100 kV (medium distance transmission lines) to 1 MV (long distance transmission lines) for greater efficiency in transmission. Power substation around town contain step-down transformers to supply electricity to medium voltage local feeders (about 6 kV to 60 kV), which in turn, is stepped down further into to low voltage feeders (around 10 kV or less) around residential areas. Wherever, electricity is needed for houses or buildings, step-down transformers mounted on the poles tap power from the feeder cables and is stepped down, providing 230 volts (center tapped) to buildings.

Center tapped means the middle of the secondary winding has a tap. Voltage at one end of the windings is 117 volts with respect to center tap; voltage at one end is 234 volts with respect to the other end. [234 volts CT is also known as 117-0-117] The power company grounds the center tap, thus, a 117 volt outlet has one hot side while a 234 volt outlet has BOTH sides hot. If you accidentally touch one side of the 234 volt wiring in your house, the shock is really a 117 volt shock, not 234 volts.

Anyways, that’s the best I can do in explaining the basics. I hope this helps. Please do not hesitate to e-mail me if you have any questions.  We’ll talk about impedence matching transformers next time.

By: Alvenh Channe (, Jan. 16, 2004.